Enhancing Agility in Young Tennis Athletes: The Impact of Holistic Forehand Groundstroke Training for Ages 16 to 18

Open

Rices Jatra, Alnedral, Kamal Firdaus, Syahrial Bahtiar, Yendrizal, Damrah, Masrun, Yovhandra Ockta, Ince Abdul Muhaemin Mangngassai

2024 International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences Vol. 12 Issue 6 Article Cited by 1 SDG 8SDG 16 Quartile

Abstract

Training models commonly used by athletes can sometimes lead to boredom and a decrease in motivation, which in turn affects their performance. Therefore, it is crucial to implement training variations that not only provide physical benefits but also enhance technical skills. This study aims to explore the impact of forehand training with a holistic approach on improving agility in tennis athletes over a period of six weeks. The research utilized a quasi-experimental design featuring a pre-test and post-test control group model, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the intervention's effectiveness. The sample consisted of 11 tennis athletes in the experimental group and 11 in the control group, selected through purposive sampling based on criteria of age (14-18 years) and technical proficiency. The forehand training program included 10 models with a holistic approach, which were certified as suitable for use in training programs. The tool used to measure agility was the shuttle run test (4 x 10 meters), effective for assessing improvements in motor capacity. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, tests for normality and homogeneity, and the Mann-Whitney test comparing the Post-Test results between the experimental and control groups. The results indicate that the forehand training model with a holistic approach significantly improved agility in tennis athletes aged 14-18 after six weeks of training, with a p-value <0.05. The Mann-Whitney test comparing the Post-Test results between the experimental and control groups yielded U = 20.5 and p-value = 0.009 (p < 0.05). This indicates a significant difference between the Post-Test results of the experimental group, which used the holistic approach, and the control group, which used standard training. The significant difference in Post-Test scores between the two groups suggests that the holistic training approach had a significantly different effect on agility improvement compared to the standard training approach applied in the control group. © 2024 by authors, all rights reserved.

Affiliations

Faculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia; Department of Physical Education, Health and Recreation, Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock