Article RETRACTED due to manipulation by the authors Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on peak oxygen uptake (vo2peak) a cardiorespiratory parameter for individuals aged 40 and above: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis; [Article RETRACTED due to manipulation by the authors Eficacia del entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad frente al entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada en el consumo máximo de oxígeno (vo2peak), un parámetro cardiorrespiratorio para personas de 40 años y más: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y meta-análisis]

Open

Ahmad Chaeroni, Hasbi Taobah Ramdani, Bekir Erhan Orhan, Mohammad Khishe, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Ilham, Deby Tri Mario

2024 Retos Vol. 59 Retracted Cited by 1 Quartile

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a crucial indicator for assessing an individual's maximal oxygen uptake capacity. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of exercise on CRF, comparisons between high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in individuals aged 40 and above remain limited and fragmented. This research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of HIIT and MICT in improving VO2peakin individuals aged 40 and above. Data were collected from Scopus and WoS databases using the PRISMA method. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed using RevMan 5.4 and JASP 0.18.3. The analysis revealed that HIIT has a greater advantage in enhancing VO2peakcompared to MICT in individuals aged 40 and above. Overall, HIIT increased VO2peakwith a z-value of 5.59 (p-value < 0.00001) and a 95% confidence interval of 0.35 [0.23, 0.48]. Conversely, MICT showed a z-value of 1.84 (p-value = 0.07) and a 95% confidence interval of 0.11 [-0.01, 0.23]. Inter-study heterogeneity was low to moderate, with an I value of 25% and τ of 0.03 for HIIT, and an I value of 0% for MICT. HIIT tends to be more effective than MICT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals aged 40 and above. However, the difference between the two methods is not statistically significant. Further research with more homogeneous designs and longer intervention durations is needed to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms of the differences in effectiveness between HIIT and MICT. © 2024 Federacion Espanola de Docentes de Educacion Fisica. All rights reserved.

Affiliations

Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia; STIKes Karsa Husada Garut, Indonesia; Istanbul Aydin University, Turkey; Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran; Sri Balaji University, India